ClimateATLASPlan a screening

RESEARCH NOTES · REVIEWED 2026-10-23

FEMA risk ratings explained

FEMA risk ratings describe relative county hazard context. Keep each original category beside its hazard, geography and release, then inspect annualized dollar loss separately. Use the sample comparison to organize location research and preserve non-rating statuses before deciding which property evidence to collect next.

What do the FEMA rating categories mean?

The hazard labels are Very Low, Relatively Low, Relatively Moderate, Relatively High and Very High. These ordered categories compare communities across all 3,232 U.S. counties. Keep each label’s hazard, geographic level and source release in your working file.

These pages display the original FEMA rating fields, not a new Climate Atlas composite score. For the underlying rating methodology, consult the FEMA National Risk Index technical documentation.

How do dollar losses compare across counties?

Labels show relative national rank. Modeled Expected Annual Loss (EAL) estimates natural-hazard losses in dollars per year. The table also shows the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) and Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) scores:

Reviewed county loss and resilience benchmarks
County / FIPSTotal EAL ($/yr)Building EAL ($/yr)Social Vulnerability (SoVI)Community Resilience (BRIC)
Los Angeles, CA 06037$7,601,846,373$5,946,330,34355.413.5
Harris, TX 48201$2,217,702,383$1,594,525,89967.917.9
Miami-Dade, FL 12086$824,686,737$592,154,13975.942.9
Denver, CO 08031$221,992,551$189,456,19617.868.5
Chittenden, VT 50007$40,136,955$32,558,64610.694.3

The Very High riverine flood category covers both $1.12B/yr in Harris and $2.81B/yr in Los Angeles. Inspect economic scale comparisons for exact figures.

What do the hurricane labels show?

EXAMPLE / HURRICANE RATINGS

One hazard, three different outcomes

Miami-Dade hurricane
Very High ($330.6M/yr EAL)
Los Angeles hurricane
No Rating (Source status retained)
Denver hurricane
Not Applicable (Source status retained)

Only Miami-Dade has an ordered category for hurricanes in these rows. Los Angeles has No Rating, while Denver is Not Applicable. Preserve all statuses as published; never substitute zero or Very Low.

Compare all seven hazard ratings ↗

Record “county hurricane context” beside the label and list the location question. Building elevation, wind mitigation ratings and flood mapping need separate site evidence. Do not accept or reject properties automatically from this sample.

What do non-rating statuses mean?

Not Applicable, No Rating and Insufficient Data sit outside the five ordered categories. Blank and missing fields also stay distinct. Never substitute zero or Very Low.

Check field documentation for the cause of a status. Until then, keep the status and record the unanswered question. Consult the field and source notes when interpreting an unfamiliar status.

Which fields should I compare?

  1. Choose one hazard and the same geographic level.
  2. Check that the records use the same source release and field.
  3. Read each original label, including non-rating statuses.
  4. Keep location findings in separate columns from county context.
  5. List the next evidence needed rather than inventing a combined safety score.

A shared category does not establish equal flood probability, exposure or expected property loss. Category labels lack the inputs for that comparison.

What should I check after reading a rating?

For property flood-zone questions, use the risk index versus flood zone guide. Record unresolved questions in the portfolio checklist and CSV template, or inspect the example report.

What does Relatively High mean for a county?

Relatively High is an ordered FEMA category describing the named county and hazard. It is above Relatively Moderate and below Very High in the category sequence. Keep the full label in the evidence table rather than abbreviating it to High, which can obscure the source terminology. Read the field definition before interpreting what was ranked.

A county label helps frame a screening question, but it does not identify which buildings drive the result. Pair the category with the corresponding hazard loss field and keep exposure in view. The examples below select hazards rated Relatively High and retain the county identifiers with the original labels.

Relatively High hazard examples from county records
County / FIPSHazardSource rating
Los Angeles, CA / 06037coastal floodingRelatively High
Los Angeles, CA / 06037heat waveRelatively High
Los Angeles, CA / 06037tornadoRelatively High
Denver, CO / 08031riverine floodingRelatively High
Denver, CO / 08031tornadoRelatively High
Miami-Dade, FL / 12086heat waveRelatively High
Miami-Dade, FL / 12086tornadoRelatively High
Harris, TX / 48201coastal floodingRelatively High

Is Very High a probability?

Very High is a category, not the probability that a particular building will be damaged. Do not turn it into a percentage or use it as a substitute for a property flood-zone determination. An elevated relative category can justify further research without supporting a numerical claim about the next event.

A sound screening statement names the hazard, county, original label and source release. A follow-up statement names the evidence still needed. Keep the follow-up actionable: name the map check or other evidence needed.

How do hazard ratings differ across the sample counties?

Los Angeles, CA: county hazard example
HazardSource rating
Coastal floodingRelatively High
Riverine floodingVery High
WildfireVery High
Heat waveRelatively High
HurricaneNo Rating
EarthquakeVery High
TornadoRelatively High

Total county expected annual loss is $7,601,846,373 per year.

Denver, CO: county hazard example
HazardSource rating
Coastal floodingNot Applicable
Riverine floodingRelatively High
WildfireVery Low
Heat waveRelatively Low
HurricaneNot Applicable
EarthquakeRelatively Moderate
TornadoRelatively High

Total county expected annual loss is $221,992,551 per year.

Miami-Dade, FL: county hazard example
HazardSource rating
Coastal floodingVery High
Riverine floodingVery High
WildfireRelatively Moderate
Heat waveRelatively High
HurricaneVery High
EarthquakeRelatively Low
TornadoRelatively High

Total county expected annual loss is $824,686,737 per year.

Harris, TX: county hazard example
HazardSource rating
Coastal floodingRelatively High
Riverine floodingVery High
WildfireRelatively Low
Heat waveVery High
HurricaneVery High
EarthquakeRelatively Moderate
TornadoVery High

Total county expected annual loss is $2,217,702,383 per year.

Chittenden, VT: county hazard example
HazardSource rating
Coastal floodingNot Applicable
Riverine floodingRelatively Moderate
WildfireVery Low
Heat waveRelatively Low
HurricaneRelatively Low
EarthquakeRelatively Low
TornadoRelatively Low

Total county expected annual loss is $40,136,955 per year.

Which decisions require additional evidence?

Category order does not define equal intervals. Compare labels for the same hazard and release, and inspect the corresponding dollar loss and exposure fields separately. A change in wording between releases needs a definition check before it is described as a change in risk. Retain the original label when preparing a summary for another reviewer.

How should I cite the evidence and review date?

Last reviewed: 2026-10-23. Source: FEMA, FEMA National Risk Index. The county sample supplies the worked values. Keep the release and field notes from the methodology with exported figures. The review date records when this guide was reviewed; the underlying observations have their own periods.

What else should I know before the next step?

Is Very High a percentage probability?

It is an ordered category showing relative percentile rank among U.S. counties. It is not a site’s damage probability.

Can I turn categories into scores from one to five?

That would add your own mathematical model. We keep source categories separate. The downloaded sample retains original text.

Does No Rating mean the same as Not Applicable?

No. Not Applicable and No Rating are distinct source statuses. Check FEMA documentation before assigning a reason to either label. Both must be preserved.

How do Expected Annual Loss dollars relate to risk ratings?

Ratings show national standing; EAL models annual dollar loss. Large building exposure can raise loss totals even where hazard frequency is moderate.